D is for Designing Woman

D is for Designing Woman, a film from 1957 that won Best Original Screenplay at the Academy Awards. Directed by Vincente Minnelli, and starring Gregory Peck and Lauren Bacall, some parts are a little dated for today, but the humor makes for a riotous timeless comedy.

I watched Gregory Peck in the wonderful Roman Holiday not long ago, and he is an excellent romantic lead. In this romantic comedy, Mike (Gregory Peck) and Marilla (Lauren Bacall) meet in LA, and it is love at first sight. They are inseparable for days and quickly get married. But now Mike, a sportswriter for a newspaper, and Marilla, a fashion designer, must learn to live together in very different worlds.

They both have apartments, very different styles and furnishings, in New York City. Even more jarring for each of them is the other’s social acquaintances. Mike is in the poker playing, fight-going male world, and Marilla is in the arts where her friends are dancers, musicians, and theater people, a veritable whirlwind of creative souls.

Complicating their relationship is jealousy. They really didn’t have enough time before they wed to share all the skeletons in their closets. Marilla is especially jealous of a relationship she suspects Mike had with Lori (Dolores Gray), an actress, singer and dancer, whom Marilla unwittingly designs fashions for in the theater.

The film employs the use of voice-overs, not just from one person, but from several of the main characters. In this way, we get to see Mike and Marilla’s story unfold through the perspective of different sets of eyes.

The funniest bits come from unlikely characters, notably a friend of Mike’s, one Maxie Stultz (Mickey Shaughnessy) who appears brain damaged from years of fighting in the ring. The other is Randy (Jack Cole), a free-spirited dancer who jumps and twirls across any surface he chooses. My husband and I were both laughing out loud at their antics. Jack Cole was an illustrious choreographer with many film credits to his name.

I must say that I am enjoying seeing some of these older films. More time is spent on dialogue, relationships and the comedy than some of the current films we are getting today. I think I’ve mentioned before that Gregory Peck was my Mom’s favorite actor, and I can surely see why. He is charming, good at physical comedy, and at romance. Lauren Bacall is sharp, point on with her characterization of Marilla, and beautiful too. She has an elegance seldom seen today.

We recognized many actors who later went on to TV shows in the 1960’s, such as Chuck Connors, and Ed Platt from Get Smart. We laughed at one scene where Mike awakens his boss in the middle of the night with a phone call. He and his wife are sleeping in twin beds! Cigarette smoking is very prevalent in the film, and it is odd to see Lauren Bacall puffing away on one. How times have changed. Give Designing Woman a watch. You won’t be disappointed.

Designing Woman trailer 

C is for Citizen Kane

C is for Citizen Kane, lauded as one of the best films in all of cinematic history. Famously written and directed by Orson Welles, this film from 1941 received an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay for Herman J. Mankiewicz and Orson Welles. It’s a black and white film that is both a mystery and a drama. The cinematography is ground breaking for its time, and a delight to watch.

Said to be loosely based on the life of William Randolph Hearst, Citizen Kane is the story of a young boy, Charles Foster Kane, placed with a guardian until he reaches the age of 25 when he is set to inherit his fortune. How parents could give away their child to a stranger is puzzling to me, but then perhaps they thought he would be provided with the kind of education that would help him manage the wealth he’d receive.

The famous word the film is known for is Rosebud. Once you see Citizen Kane, you will never forget what it stands for. The film opens with the death of Charles Kane, and a bevy of reporters work to find out the truth of his life, and especially of the last word he spoke aloud before he died: Rosebud.

The reporter Jerry Thompson (William Alland) interviews Kane’s business associates, friends, an ex-wife and others in the pursuit of what his life stood for. Besides being about Charles Kane, the film is also about politics, wealth, the working class, scandal, and all of these are way too familiar to us as the fake news and buying of candidates continues on in the current political arena. His best friend Jedediah Leland (Joseph Cotten) is faithful to him early on, and then finds Kane’s manipulations too much to continue being involved with him.

The mansion called Xanadu that Kane built in Florida is probably eerily like the Hearst Mansion in California. I can’t really say as I’ve never visited the place, but I’m sure they had in common the opulence, garish furnishings, and perhaps even a zoo. No wonder Kane’s second wife Susan (Dorothy Comingore) felt like she was caged in that place.

Orson Welles was only 25 years old when he came out with this story. He absolutely shined as a director who took risks in how the story was filmed, from the flashbacks to Kane’s childhood, to the early days as a newspaper owner to the empire it became, to his failed run for governor. We learn about Kane only as the reporter learns about his life as he searches out those who knew him best. Orson Welles performance is Oscar worthy, and he should have won for Best Actor that year.

The highest honors at the Academy Awards in 1942 went to How Green Was My Valley, and Sergeant York, which was a sentimental choice at best, probably because America was now in World War II. Should have gone to Citizen Kane in my opinion. Watch it if you haven’t.

Citizen Kane - Theatrical Trailer 

B is for The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer

B is for The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer, a black and white film from 1947 that won Best Original Screenplay at the Academy Awards for screenwriter Sidney Sheldon.

Richard “Dick” Nugent (Cary Grant) is an artist who charms the ladies, often causing fights among the other men involved with them. He ends up in the court room of Judge Margaret Turner (Myrna Loy) who allows him to walk out without sentencing him. Unbeknownst to her, he is scheduled to give a speech at the high school of her sister Susan (Shirley Temple). Susan is immediately infatuated with the suave and debonair Richard, and believes she has fallen in love with him, misreading his interactions with her.

When Susan shows up at his apartment ready to be his model, it causes all sorts of drama when Margaret finds her there. Richard wants nothing to do with this precocious 17-year-old, but is talked into dating her by Margaret and District Attorney Tommy Chamberlain (Rudy Vallee) so that she’ll get him out of her system.

Susan’s boyfriend Jerry White (Johnny Sands) is bereft at her sudden change of heart, and Richard tries his best to get them back together. This is a comedy after all, and there are many laugh out loud moments. One night Richard and Margaret arrange a meeting at an elegant restaurant and dance spot, and people keep showing up and joining them. It felt like a comedy routine: how many people can you get around a table at one time? Quick witty dialogue among the participants ensues, and it is very well acted.

Shirley Temple didn’t act very much after this film. My husband commented that 1947, those years between the end of World War II and the beginning of the Cold War, was an interesting period. There are some awkward moments of male dominance toward women (the uncle threatening to spank the wayward Susan for example), but on the other hand, Judge Turner is a woman with a very important role in society.

Something that irritated me was that Richard’s artwork is never shown. His easel and workspace is more of a suggestion, and I believe it was just painted scenery in the background. He could have been any number of creative men; artist seems to have been picked out of a hat. He doesn’t even look like an artist: not starving, not bedraggled (always wearing a suit), and his speech to the students doesn’t even have to do with art.

Where Cary Grant shines is in the slapstick kind of comedy he was so good at, like when he is at a picnic and is coerced into competing in some physical races, including sack racing, and an obstacle course.

Sidney Sheldon was an accomplished writer penning novels, screenplays and TV shows, his biggest hits in the 1960’s on TV were The Patty Duke Show and I Dream of Jeannie. His The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer is a cute film, and if nothing else, will leave you laughing.

The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer trailer 

A is for An American in Paris

A is for An American in Paris, a musical from 1951. It won six Academy Awards including Best Original Screenplay for Alan Jay Lerner, Best Picture, Cinematography, Set Decoration, Costume Design, and Best Music (scoring of a musical picture). Although nominated, Vincente Minnelli did not win for Best Director.

The film takes place in post World War II Paris. GI Jerry Mulligan (Gene Kelly) has remained in the city and is an artist, painting scenes of the beautiful city and selling them on the streets. Jerry as narrator introduces us to his story at the beginning of the film, and makes every movement in his very tiny apartment a dance.

His best friend, Adam Cook (Oscar Levant, who was a brilliant musician and composer), also lives in the building, and is a concert pianist lacking an audience. The third gentleman central to the story is a Frenchman, Henri Baurel (Georges Guétary) who is a stage entertainer.

The female interests are Milo Roberts (Nina Foch) and Lise Bouvier (Leslie Caron). Milo decides to become a patron of the arts by promoting Jerry’s work, but not without some ulterior motives for she is attracted to Jerry.

The young Lise is engaged to Henri, but Jerry spies her in a club and goes after her. This really is how it looks; he practically stalks her. This is a part of the film that was not well written. We never see what the connections are between Lise and Jerry and why they are in love. Conversation is practically absent. What they do together is dance, and that of course is quite delightful. Leslie Caron was an accomplished ballet dancer, and her introduction to us through the love-smitten eyes of Henri showcases her talents in bold colors and variations of dance that really do her credit.

Even the relationship between Jerry and Milo is better defined in their dialogue and interactions. We know exactly what their relationship is and is not, and the two actors do a great job depicting it.

The film has some memorable songs, written by Ira Gershwin (lyrics) and George Gershwin (music). Gene Kelly choreographed all the dances, including the beautiful introduction to Lise, as well as the totally amped up fantasy dance sequence at the end of the film. He was quite a talent.

Nina Foch was a tall, beautiful blonde who had a long career in acting, and incidentally was married for a time to James Lipton of Inside the Actors Studio fame. She also taught acting classes. Oscar Levant was well known for keeping the music of George Gershwin alive after he died. It would have been lovely to hear him play on stage.

An American in Paris is a classic musical that is well worth your time. Have you seen it, and what are your thoughts about the relationship between Jerry and Lise? Despite my criticisms of that part of the story, I basically enjoy the film for the music and dancing, and for the Paris setting.

 An American in Paris - Trailer

Unbreakable

Not long after M. Night Shyamalan came out with The Sixth Sense, he filmed and released a movie in 2000 called Unbreakable. If you’ve seen The Sixth Sense, you will know that it has quite a reveal at the end of the film, and know that you never, ever, tell anyone the details leading up to the surprise ending. Unbreakable is like this. Don’t worry. No spoilers from me.

David Dunn (Bruce Willis) has been looking for a job in New York City, and is on the train on the way back home to Philadelphia to his estranged wife Audrey (Robin Wright), and his son Joseph (Spencer Treat Clark). The train derails in a tragic accident, and David is strangely uninjured, the only survivor.

Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson) is an art dealer, obsessed with comic books and all things in the superhero vein. He has a medical disorder that leaves him susceptible to serious bone fractures, and has had a physically excrutiating and miserable time his entire life because of it.

After the train crash is publicized and David identified as the sole survivor, Elijah contacts David and asks him if he has ever been sick. Thus begins the building of a tentative relationship between David and Elijah. As David remembers who he is through the questions that Elijah asks, and as he recalls unusual things that have happened to him in his life, his self-awareness builds. He lets Joseph in on his journey of self-discovery, and meanwhile Audrey decides she wants to make a go of it again with David, once so distant and untouchable.

What I liked a great deal about this film were the performances by Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson. Bruce gives a nuanced performance as the depressed security guard searching for some meaning to his life, whereas, Samuel plays Elijah as a slightly crazed and frantic man almost stalking David around in desperation.

M. Night Shyamalan has come out with some interesting films since The Sixth Sense. I liked The Village. Lady in the Water was a little weird, but I appreciated it anyway, and reviewed the film on this blog, and Signs was absolutely terrifying. I heard Shyamalan has come out with a new film and wonder what he has in store for us this time. I have heard him interviewed, and he said Hitchcock was an inspiration to him. He takes the suspense and thrills in classic Hitchcock films even further, especially in the strong final reveal at the end of his films.

Unbreakable is rated PG-13 for mature thematic elements including some disturbing violent content, and for a crude sexual reference. I suggest that anyone who enjoys superhero Marvel comic films watch this subtle and engrossing mystery. Two men so opposite of each other that you will wonder what their connection is. Are they just ordinary men, or men with extraordinary gifts?

Have you seen Unbreakable, and what did you think of it? Comment below, and happy movie watching days.

Hancock

Hancock is not your typical superhero movie, but that is what made it so entertaining and charming.  John Hancock (Will Smith), is a dysfunctional superhero who terrorizes Los Angeles as much as he saves its citizens from the bad guys. I liked this film very much, especially as early on I knew there would be some kind of reveal happening midway, but I never predicted what the actual twist was.

Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman) is an ambitious public relations executive who wants to help change the world. His audacious suggestions to a pharmaceutical company for a branding campaign with a heart logo seems a bit over done, even to an optimist like me. The pharmaceutical company didn’t like it either. He has a son Aaron (Jae Head) and a wife Mary (Charlize Theron) and they live in a nice neighborhood somewhere in LA.

One typically busy California day, Ray gets stuck in horrible traffic, and making matters worse, on a railroad track. Hancock saves him from certain death from an oncoming train, and in the process causes a lot of damage to virtually everything close to the train and Ray’s car. Ray is now Hancock’s biggest fan, and explains to him how he can improve his reputation as a superhero. Citizens are as angry with Hancock as they are happy to receive his help. He drinks too much, is rude and vulgar, and causes a great deal of destruction to the city during his miraculous rescues. He needs a complete makeover.

Hancock ends up going to prison at Ray’s assurance that it will help in the long run in gaining the public’s confidence again. He actually begins to work on himself in therapy while incarcerated, and when the chief of police calls asking him to help them in a dangerous hostage situation, Hancock responds.

The film is rated PG-13 for some intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, and language. Even superheroes have flaws is what this film seems to be saying, just like humans, and I knew we’d get to know where Hancock came from before the end of the film. It didn’t disappoint. Will Smith does a great job as always with his charm and the spot on comedic acting skills he’s delivered in so many films. Some of my favorites of his are Men In Black (1, 2 and 3), and Independence Day. He can play a good romantic lead too as in the very funny Hitch, and a more serious role as in The Pursuit of Happyness and Ali, both performances nominated for Best Actor at the Academy Awards. He’s one of the best actors of our day.

Jason Bateman is a good counter to Hancock’s dysfunction as he is one very upbeat person. And the mysterious Charlize Theron plays Mary as the sexy, yet restrained woman that Ray fell in love with, a good mother and wife.

Hancock is pure entertainment. I recommend it highly. I’ll be reviewing another atypical superhero film next time, Unbreakable.

2018 A to Z Challenge Theme Reveal

 

I’m excited to be participating in the Blogging from A to Z Challenge for a third year! This year I am continuing to review films that won Best Original Screenplay at the Academy Awards, with a few Best Adapted Screenplays thrown in, and even some that were nominated in the writing categories, but did not win. It’s really all about the alphabet when you do the Blogging from A to Z Challenge!

The list of films I’ll be reviewing include 14 films that won Best Original Screenplay, six that won Best Adapted Screenplay, one that was nominated for Best Original Screenplay, and five that were nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay. I’ll include links to trailers for these films for your viewing pleasure.

Check back on April 1^st for the beginning of the challenge and my first review!

Beauty and the Beast (2017)

Beauty and the Beast was nominated for two Academy Awards this year, but did not win. The nominations were for Best Costume Design, and Best Production Design. It lost to Phantom Thread and The Shape of Water respectively. The film is rated PG for some action violence, peril and frightening images.

I liked this mostly live version of the classic tale. I recall seeing the animated version of Beauty and the Beast way back in 1991 accompanied by a child who enjoyed it too. There were two teenage girls sitting nearby who were crying their eyes out at the end of the film. I thought it a little odd, as it wasn’t affecting me that way. But then I was an adult. The films were based on Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont’s 18^th century fairy tale.

Even though I am much older now, I thoroughly enjoyed this tale of a Beast under a wicked spell who cannot be changed until a lady loves him freely.

Belle (Emma Watson) is an independent young woman, living with her father Maurice (Kevin Kline). When Maurice leaves on business and does not return, Belle ventures out to find him. She happens upon the castle that holds the Beast (Dan Stevens) under his curse, along with all his servants who have been turned into normally inanimate objects that can now speak, as after all, they once were human.

The egotistical hunter and former soldier Gaston (Luke Evans) is intent on having Belle for his bride, and incites the villagers to go after the Beast with destruction on their minds.  The tension mounts as we wonder if the Beast will escape alive.

The sets and costumes were delightful, really well done and consistent to the era we are supposedly seeing in the countryside of France. It is a sweet love story after all, with Belle growing to like the ungainly beast, and he loving her in return. The music written by Alan Menken is really quite lovely, and the songs, lyrics by various writers, are sung well and add another dimension to the story.

Watching Emma Watson play Belle, I kept being reminded of Kristen Stewart who famously played Bella in The Twilight Saga films. Why this kept happening I’m not sure. Could be their looks, or perhaps their acting?

The ensemble cast that lent their voice talents to the servants cast under the spell along with the Beast included Emma Thompson, Ian McKellen, Ewan McGregor, and Stanley Tucci.

I watched Beauty and the Beast at home one evening when I needed something light and uplifting to raise my spirits, as there has been so much hate and negativity in the world lately. Maybe it is a fairy tale, and we all know just because a woman loves a flawed man he won’t miraculously turn into a nice guy for her affections. But then this is a fairy tale, a story that can give hope, and so for a couple hours that’s what we escape to. Hope.

Icarus

Icarus won Best Documentary Feature at the Academy Awards this year for producers Bryan Fogel and Dan Cogan. I found it an interesting title for a film that exposes the doping of Olympic athletes in Russia. (Icarus is the man in Greek mythology who flew too close to the sun, and plunged to his death.) The film is rated TV-MA, and I watched it on Netflix.

The film begins with a quote from George Orwell: “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

Filmmaker Bryan Fogel has been an avid bicyclist for many years. He decided to see if his performance on a grueling cycling course through France would be improved by drugging up with testosterone and human growth hormone among other substances. He is subsequently referred to a Russian, head of the lab that tests for chemicals in athletes’ urine, Grigory Rodchenkov. He agrees to help Fogel with his project and the documentary is born.

Fogel and Rodchenkov develop a friendship while Rodchenkov gives him pointers on how to give himself injections and in what amounts to improve his athletic skills. Rodchenkov even tests his urine, as they would do in Russia. Sadly, all the drugs and training don’t seem to make a difference when Fogel competes in the race in France.

Rodchenkov though is willing to spill all about the systematic doping of Russian athletes, and thus continues this engrossing documentary. You need to sit through the early part where Fogel does his regime of therapies, and then the film turns into a sort of political thriller.

Interestingly, throughout the film Rodchenkov is reading George Orwell’s 1984 and referring to it as he describes his experience working for the Russian government. His role was to enhance athletes’ performance in a state supported doping program, and to then assist in a cover-up of what they were doing so that World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) would not find out.

Icarus documents an expose of a program that has been in place for decades to enhance the performance of Olympic athletes of Russia. This ultimately led to Rodchenkov having to go into hiding at the recommendation of the United States Department of Justice.

I hope most athletes despise drug enhancements during competition. There should be an equal playing field just based on one’s strength and natural abilities. But when a political regime comes into the picture that wants to show superiority of their people, that’s when calculated deceit comes into play.

The documentary film itself was really well done. The cinematography and music in between actual interviews is beautiful, and keeps the viewer from becoming bored with straight question and answer sessions. I appreciated the film’s artistic quality that enhanced the entire experience.

The ending quote of the film is: “This film is dedicated to whistleblowers, who seek truth over consequences, and to clean athletes everywhere who choose to play by the rules.” I think you would find this an interesting documentary whether you follow sports or not.

Last Men in Aleppo

Last Men in Aleppo was nominated for Best Documentary Feature at the Academy Awards this year (lost to Icarus). The film is about the White Helmets, a group of men in Syria who scour the city searching for survivors after homes and buildings have been bombed. Unfortunately, they must also deal with fatalities, often of children and babies. The film was written and directed by Feras Fayyad of Syria, and co-directed by film editor Steen Johannessen of Denmark.

In 2017, a short film about this group of volunteer rescue workers called The White Helmets won an Academy Award for Best Documentary Short Subject. This recent award for a film about the group possibly contributed to why the feature film Last Men in Aleppo did not win this year. (Plus Icarus was an excellent film and deserved to win.)

Syria has been at war for over five years now, and the brave men searching for victims in the rubble at times despair of the West coming to help them. They face death and destruction by rebel shelling, and by Russian warplanes dropping bombs.

The motto of the Syria Civil Defense (White Helmets) is, “To save a life is to save all of humanity.” I don’t usually become political in my posts, but in this case I am going to provide a link to a website that will give you more information about the plight of the people in Syria. Here it is: Syria Civil Defense

I would be surprised if anyone could watch this film and not be deeply affected by seeing the death and fear on screen that these innocent victims live with on a daily basis. Humanitarian aide should not be dictated by politics or religion, but be given because we are all human. The White Helmets are unarmed and neutral and don’t see a difference between people. What some may label as an enemy is still a soul worth saving.

There is no sparing the viewer of Last Men in Aleppo of the death and injury sustained to civilians as their city is bombed. The men who seek to save them are relentless in removing rubble from the crumbling buildings to find even one survivor, while others choose to leave Syria, fleeing a war zone that grows more dangerous by the day.

Last Men in Aleppo won the World Documentary Grand Jury Prize at the 2017 Sundance Film Festival. The film is not rated. I watched it on Netflix. The film is really a historical document, like news coverage you might see on a quality news station, only longer. It’s mainly about the search and rescues, even though we see and hear the bombs going off and dropping throughout the city. It also shows the admiration the people have for the White Helmets, and their own struggle to survive in a city where resources are scarce.

I really don’t have anything else to add to my review here. The film’s images speak for the people of Syria.

90th Academy Award After Thoughts

I watched the Academy Awards with a friend a couple of days after the original telecast. Unusual for me, as I’ve watched this awards show faithfully every year for over two decades. But I opted instead to go to a live blues performance and skipped the Sunday show. Apparently others skipped it too, as the numbers of viewers were lower than normal.

I found the show to be respectful and dignified, not without humor, but with a certain serious note to it. Jimmy Kimmel was fine as host, and I liked they went to a theater where a sneak preview of A Wrinkle in Time was showing to honor moviegoers. Sweet.

As far as the awards went, I did okay with a few of my predictions. They were really more of a wish list for me, and I was not really surprised over some of the winners, such as Costume Design for Phantom Thread. I have yet to see it, but it is after all about couture.

Sound Editing, Sound Mixing and Film Editing won for Dunkirk. As Adam of The Academy Award Project says, war movies typically score in these areas.

Four awards for The Shape of Water, including Best Picture of the year were well deserved. I was happy Jordan Peele won for Get Out as Best Original Screenplay. Haven’t seen Best Foreign Language Film, A Fantastic Woman yet, but will do so, and look forward to Daniela Vega’s performance. Also will be seeing Call Me by Your Name, winning Best Adapted Screenplay for James Ivory at the age of 89.

What disappointed me was Frances McDormand winning for Best Actress. Seriously, Sally Hawkins deserved it. I read someone stole McDormand’s Oscar from her that evening. She got it back that night, and I quipped on Facebook that he stole it intending it go to its rightful owner, Sally.

I was turned off from the start by the trailer for Three Billboards . . . and after reading about the flaws in the writing of the screenplay, chose not to see it. I may never watch it. Too much violence, and not a good role model for the change we need to see in the world.

Her speech was interesting. I am all for women’s stories and screenplays to be funded and filmed, and then she brought up inclusion rider. This is a stipulation in a contract requiring a certain level of diversity among cast and crew.

I think there would be no need for an inclusion rider if more screenplays were produced and written by women of all ethnicities and about women’s stories. I think that would pretty much solve the issue of inclusion right off the bat. Where crew is concerned could be a different story and may be necessary. What we need is fewer superhero movies or war movies, etc. and more real human stories some examples of which were showcased this year with nominations.

That’s my take on the festivities. What do you think?

Lonely Are the Brave

I first became aware of Lonely Are the Brave, a 1962 black and white film, at the Hollywood in New Mexico exhibit at the Albuquerque Museum (the exhibit is no longer on view). I was intrigued by the story of cowboy meets modern day southwest, and the fact that the screenplay was written by Dalton Trumbo, a screenwriter I admire. The screenplay was based on the book The Brave Cowboy by Edward Abbey, and was filmed in New Mexico.

Jack Burns (Kirk Douglas) is a cowboy making his living herding sheep, and in between jobs he travels across the high desert to Albuquerque on his horse Whiskey. He is unhappy to find fences where there used to be none as he crosses the vast desert landscape. His world is changing. When he shows up at the home of Paul Bondi (Michael Kane) and his wife Jerry (Gena Rowlands), he discovers that Paul is in jail for helping illegals gain access to the States.

Jack decides to break Paul out of prison. Not a man to be deterred, he picks a fight in a bar with a one-armed man and eventually makes it into jail where he finds Paul. (Carroll O’Connor has a role as a truck driver coming from Missouri to New Mexico. You don’t really know his part of this tale until the ending.)

Jack plans a jailbreak, and some of the other prisoners escape with him. A manhunt for Jack ensues headed by Sheriff Morey Johnson (Walter Matthau). Deputy Sheriff Gutierrez (George Kennedy) is not happy about Jack’s successful escape from his prison, and hunts Jack as he travels up the Sandia Mountains on his horse Whiskey. I especially enjoyed the scenery of Albuquerque, as the film focuses heavily on the foothills and steep cliffs of the Sandia Mountains. That was one of the best parts of the film, seeing the Rio Grande, the skyline of Albuquerque circa 1962, and the canyons and arroyos of New Mexico, often from a bird’s eye view.

A thoughtful tale of the old way colliding with the new, I appreciated how Trumbo wrote the character of Sheriff Johnson who was played so well by Walter Matthau. Matthau should have gotten an award for his performance. He shows a compassion for the predicament of Jack, and even some admiration for what the escapee is doing in fleeing straight up over the mountains.

I recommend Lonely Are the Brave if you know the Southwest, particularly Albuquerque, and if you like good storytelling. The filming was really superb and my husband and I both marveled at how they made the action so suspenseful, and how dangerous it must have been to the performers and to the horse Whiskey!

Kirk Douglas approached Dalton Trumbo to write the screenplay as he had worked with him previously on Spartacus. It was a good choice as Trumbo was able to infuse the storytelling with an understanding of this good man caught between worlds as the times changed around him.

Predictions (or more accurately, wish list) of winners at the 90th Academy Awards

Inspired by a fellow blogger who posted his as well as his wife’s predictions, I could not resist making a few of my own. I am only going to share my thoughts on categories where I’ve seen at least three of the five nominated films (or two of the three nominated in one category). It was difficult to pick in some cases, kind of like choosing apples or oranges. But here are my preferences for the win.

Original Screenplay: Get Out

Jordan Peele wrote a tight, well-constructed screenplay melding social commentary within a horror genre, with just the right amount of humor thrown in now and then to lighten up the darkest moments.

Animated Feature: Loving Vincent

When an entire film is painted and then animated, well you can’t get better than that. And the story of the last days of Vincent Van Gogh was touching.

Production Design: Beauty and the Beast

For lavish and magical sets, this film wins hands down.

Makeup and Hairstyling: Darkest Hour

He looked like Churchill.

Film Editing: I, Tonya

That wasn’t really Margot Robbie doing those triple axels. But it sure looked like she was jumping and skating like Tonya.

Documentary Feature: Icarus

An interesting expose into the doping within sports, most notably Olympic athletes by the Russians, this is a well-done documentary that plays like a thriller.

Costume Design: Beauty and the Beast

Great costuming, and so many different styles of dress really helped tell the classic story.

Director: Guillermo del Toro, The Shape of Water

He made this monster movie that is so much more fit together perfectly.

Cinematography: The Shape of Water

Beautiful visuals, from the opening scene to the last.

Supporting Actress: Laurie Metcalf, Lady Bird

A nuanced performance of a demanding mother with heart not quite ready to let go.

Actress: Sally Hawkins, The Shape of Water

The range of emotion she gives in this superior film is extraordinary. And without talking. Wow.

Picture: The Shape of Water

This is the one that will be remembered for years to come, and watched again and again.

Who do you want to win in your favorite category?

Enjoy the Awards show, and I’ll post again later in the week.

Get Out

Although I had heard some things regarding the Academy Award nominated film Get Out, I wasn’t really all that well informed about what the movie was about. Described as horror-comedy and social thriller, it is everything this type of film should be: a knuckle biting, writhing in your chair experience, with you and your fellow moviegoers whispering, “Get Out” as the film progresses. The film is rated R for violence, bloody images, and language including sexual references.

Chris Washington (Daniel Kaluuya) is an African-American photographer who has been dating a white woman, Rose Armitage (Allison Williams) for four months. She insists on taking him to her parents’ home in the secluded countryside for a weekend.

Things are strange right from the start of Chris’s visit. Rose’s father Dean (Bradley Whitford) and mother Missy (Catherine Keener) seem typical parents, kind of clueless as to how their conversation and actions may be perceived by Chris. Their live-in help are even stranger: two African-Americans, Georgina (Betty Gabriel) and Walter (Marcus Henderson) who are just plain odd. Chris is an observant young man and notices the incongruent behavior immediately.

Chris has a friend who works for the TSA, Rod Williams (LilRel Howery), who had warned him prior to his leaving the city not to take this trip. The situation at the Armitage estate becomes crazier and crazier, and eventually the sheer terror of Chris’s situation takes hold of him. These people are up to no good.

Get Out has been nominated for four Academy Awards: Best Picture, Best Director for Jordan Peele, Best Actor for Daniel Kaluuya, and Best Original Screenplay, written by Jordan Peele. As a first time director, Mr. Peele did a fantastic job. He also did a fantastic job writing the screenplay; it is so tight and well thought out, and I really admired it. There is just the right amount of fear and comedic relief in this horror story. His vision to show what it is like for African-Americans, the stereotypes and the actual harm others can wish on them, is shown here along with the more sci-fi aspects of this very evil family Chris finds himself stuck with for the weekend.

The film had a kind of feel I recalled from seeing The Stepford Wives long ago. Walter and Georgina, and a guest at a party the Armitage’s host particularly had that same vacant expression on their faces, which really made me wonder what was going on. When it is revealed what this family is doing, it was truly horrific.

I saw Get Out in the theater and enjoyed my fellow movie lover’s reactions. We were all held glued to the screen by this story. All the actors did a marvelous job at their really quirky characters, and I especially enjoyed the performance of LilRel Howery who played TSA agent Rod. Will Chris get out okay? And will Jordan Peele or Daniel Kaluuya get out of the Academy Awards ceremony with a coveted award? Watch and see for yourself.

The Post

Nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards, The Post is a fine example of what film can be: educational, thought provoking, historical, entertaining, and all without gratuitous violence.

This film is based on the true story of the unfolding of events in the early 1970’s when The Washington Post received stolen government documents that had been laboriously photocopied and would come to be known as the Pentagon Papers. They were volumes of top-secret files outlining the deceit that occurred within the U.S. government to prolong the Vietnam War, a war that could not be won.

Over 50,000 American servicemen and women died during this ill-fated conflict, including a cousin of mine that is a bitter and traumatic memory still today for me. I had to witness his burial at the tender age of a high school freshman. It made me the anti-war/pro-peace person I am today. But enough about me.

The publisher of The Washington Post, Katharine Graham (Meryl Streep), came into her position after the untimely death of her husband. Her right hand man is Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), a rather irascible and keen editor who has the trust of both Katharine and his employees.

Journalist Ben Bagdikian (Bob Odenkirk) gets a lead on obtaining the government documents, and when The New York Times is censored by the Attorney General’s office from publishing them, the caretakers of the purloined papers, who believe it is necessary to make them public for the good of the country, contact Bagdikian.

The decision of whether to publish this information is not taken lightly. The press and national government are closely linked. They are shown celebrating each other’s birthdays and retirement, and dining at expensive restaurants together. They are friends and colleagues. Katharine really agonizes over this decision as she and others could be jailed for printing it.

She also has to overcome the distrust of male colleagues and superiors in the company, as this is after all the 1970’s, and she is the first woman to serve as CEO of a major newspaper.

I enjoyed seeing the actual newspaper come to print, including the focus on the typesetting procedures, something that is no longer used today. Technology has certainly advanced quite a lot in the last four plus decades.

Similar to Best Picture winner Spotlight (2015), journalism and its value to the public interest is a focus here. Steven Spielberg does a fantastic job keeping the forward motion of the story going. Meryl Streep is unlikely to win for Best Actress, as there are some great performances by women at the Academy Awards this year. Bob Odenkirk, from Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul fame, is cast well as Bagdikian and plays his role brilliantly. Liz Hannah and Josh Singer wrote the screenplay. Josh  co-wrote the screenplay for Spotlight, for which he won Best Original Screenplay at the Academy Awards. The Post is a great film and one I hope you’ll watch. It is rated PG-13 for language and brief war violence.

Abacus: Small Enough to Jail

Abacus: Small Enough to Jail is nominated for Best Documentary Feature at the Academy Awards. Remember that financial crisis that happened back in 2008? When the financial institutions committed financial crimes and mortgage fraud that affected an astounding number of people in America? And how not one of the banks or its employees were brought to a reckoning for what they perpetrated, much less had to face consequences for the crimes?

Ah, but there was one bank that was prosecuted: Abacus Federal Savings Bank in Manhattan’s Chinatown, New York City. This film is the story of that trial and subsequent outcome.

Thomas Sung came to America as an immigrant, as did many Chinese who settled in this case in New York City, making a community for themselves not unlike what was the norm in their villages in China. Mr. Sung was a well-educated attorney, and decided that in order to help his community, he will open a financial institution, Abacus Federal Savings Bank. (An abacus is a type of calculator that was used in China before the advent of computers.)

Unfortunately, Mr. Sung has a few employees, and one in particular, who is unethical and is seeing to it that those applying for home loans are approved even if they are not really qualified. Just like all the other banks are doing during the same time period. The difference is, Mr. Sung doesn’t know about it. When he and his daughters, Jill Sung and Vera Sung, who both work at the bank, discover it, the employee is promptly fired.

But the District Attorney’s office brings them to trial anyway, in a blatant racist move. Coincidentally, his third daughter has been working for the DA’s office and resigns when the conflict of interest becomes evident.

I thought that the filmmaker, Steve James, did a good job of explaining complicated financial matters in an engrossing manner, as well as showing the trial progress through artist drawings sketched after the fact. Mr. Sung, his wife Hwei Lin, and his daughters appear in the film, as well as people from the DA’s office, which was surprising. Guess that office hoped to vindicate themselves for actions taken.

Why should you watch this film you may ask? Just to get incensed all over again about the way financial institutions gutted the savings and foreclosed homes of people they never should have approved in the first place? Not just that. Abacus: Small Enough to Jail is a fascinating look at a part of New York City where hard working immigrants do their best to survive in a community that is perhaps more closely knit than any other you may find in America. Everyone knows everyone else here it seems, and you can’t say that for most people living in bedroom communities across America.

Still the prejudice and labeling that went down in this investigation and subsequent court trial when no other banks were prosecuted is shameful. America has a long way to go. Start with your vote.

The Breadwinner

The Breadwinner has been nominated for Best Animated Feature Film at the Academy Awards. The screenplay was written by Anita Doron and Deborah Ellis, and is based on the children’s novel, The Breadwinner, by Deborah Ellis. The film is rated PG-13 for thematic material including some violent images. The dialogue is in English. Angelina Jolie was executive producer for this thought provoking and visually striking film. An engaging story, it is about the life of a young girl, Parvana, living with her family in Afghanistan.

Parvana is an 11-year-old girl growing up under the Taliban in 2001. Her father is wrongfully arrested and taken to prison, and this places her mother Fattema, sister Soraya, and baby brother in peril without a man to provide for them. Parvana is ridiculed and threatened by neighbor boys, especially after her father is taken away. She serendipitously meets a friend, Shauzia, who has changed her identity to that of a boy and has become streetwise. Shauzia is willing to help Parvana with a similar deception. Women are not to appear in public without a male, and Parvana finds a way to navigate the job she takes on as breadwinner by cutting her hair and dressing as a boy. She is emboldened by the freedom this gives her.

Within the film is a mythical tale running parallel to Parvana’s story. She tells this story in pieces to her baby brother. Filled with beautiful, evocative imagery, the story Parvana tells her brother and really herself, adds richness to the very real situation that she encounters with no father to care for them. The mythology is really about childhood empowerment, and is a tale she had heard from her father about a boy who seeks to recover the stolen seeds of his village from the Elephant King. There is much danger along the path of this boy’s journey as he tries to retrieve what are rightfully the village’s seeds for the future, much like it is for Parvana, who decides to go to the prison where her father is held and ask for his release.

The story brought to mind another film where a female impersonates a male. A woman yearning for knowledge in a culture that does not support education for women, Yentl dresses as a man in order to study with other scholars and experience a freedom women could not. The film is Yentl with Barbara Streisand in the leading role, and is a tale that takes place in Jewish culture.

The Breadwinner is also in another culture that you might say is quite different from American culture and Christianity. I think it is good to hear these types of stories as it helps us understand other cultures and shows the similarities especially in women’s lives under the subjugation of men, and the discrimination that occurs. Also significant is the part of the story about people just trying to live as a family caught between empires fighting for dominance. I recommend The Breadwinner to you.

Victoria & Abdul

Victoria & Abdul is a historical and biographical drama about Queen Victoria and her friendship with a young Indian clerk, Abdul Karim. It was nominated for two Academy Awards for Best Costume Design, and Best Makeup and Hairstyling. The film is rated PG-13 for some thematic elements and language.

Queen Victoria (Judi Dench) is in her 80’s, and has recently become Empress of India as her empire continues to expand. In 1887, two Indians from Agra are summoned to England to present the Queen with a mohur, which is a gold coin that has been minted in India to honor the Empress. Abdul Karim (Ali Fazal) is excited to be sailing the oceans on an adventure, whereas his companion Mohammed (Adeel Akhtar) is less than thrilled.

The subsequent ceremony to present the Queen with the mohur is really something to be seen. Victoria is charmed by Abdul’s innocence and allegiance to her, and they become friends at her insistence. She asks him to remain in England to teach her Hindi and the Qur’an. He insists that to learn Urdu is more suited to someone of her standing, and the Queen proves to be an apt pupil, to the consternation of her staff, advisors, and son Bertie, Prince of Wales (Eddie Izzard). She practices penmanship, speaking the Urdu language, and reading the Qur’an. She refers to Abdul as her Munshi, a term used for native language teachers at that time.

The film shows us the prejudice and racism that prevailed at the time of the occupation of India by British troops. Abdul is not just Indian, he is a Muslim, and is scorned, plotted against, and the Queen’s staff threatens to walk out if he remains on site. Her advisors would like to prove she is insane, which she most definitely is not. Abdul remains devoted to the aged queen until her death.

Stephen Frears, who also directed Philomena, The Queen, and Dangerous Liaisons, directed Victoria & Abdul. The screenplay was written by Lee Hall, and was based on the book by Shrabani Basu. Ms. Basu discovered the hidden friendship between the two unlikely companions during a visit to the Isle of Wight’s Osborne House, where she noticed a portrait of an Indian servant in the Durbar Room that did not appear to be the likeness of a servant. She began research into who Abdul Karim really was, and what he meant to the Queen. She wrote Victoria and Abdul: The True Story of the Queen’s Closest Confidant after four years of extensive research.

These stories are essential to tell as we come to terms with empire, and the accompanying subjugation of native peoples that has occurred throughout recorded time. I enjoyed this film, and learning about Ms. Basu’s dedicated search for the truth about Victoria and Abdul. Here is a link to an excellent article about her search for the truth: http://time.com/4941313/victoria-and-abdul-true-story-shrabani-basu/ I hope you enjoy Victoria & Abdul and the history behind the film as much as I did.

Dunkirk

Dunkirk has been nominated for Best Picture, Director, Cinematography, Film Editing, Original Score, Production Design, Sound Editing, and Sound Mixing at the Academy Awards. There are no acting nominations among these, and that’s because this is a war movie with lots of action and sometimes long drawn out scenes of waiting. Waiting to see if a soldier will escape detection by the enemy, waiting to see if the boats sailing across the English Channel will arrive in time to save the Allied troops, and waiting to see if any RAF pilots will prevail in the skies over the Germans. The historic evacuation of Allied soldiers from certain death by the Nazis, who have them surrounded and pinned in on the beach, occurs in May 1940.

The film is rated PG-13 for intense war experience and some language. I will first provide you with a few pointers to make your viewing of Dunkirk, if you haven’t already seen it, more enjoyable and less frustrating for you.

Number one: Turn on the subtitles on your TV. I am shamefaced to admit that I have difficulty hearing what British actors are saying due to their accents. Additionally, with the near constant drone of airplanes, boat engines, and screaming men, I had trouble hearing the dialogue. You will thank me for this tip if you’re watching the film at home.

Number two: At the beginning of the movie, the “Mole” is referred to. I looked this up and the mole is a long concrete jetty that protects a beach. It is not referring to a spy. Knowing this helps you understand what Commander Bolton (Kenneth Branagh) is talking about when he describes the difficulty of getting any large craft close enough to shore to take on any men. The Nazi bombing had rendered the harbor useless, and the only way large ships could get close enough to shore to rescue anyone was by sidling up to one of the two moles.

Number three: The film alternates between three points of view during the relatively short time of the Dunkirk rescues. These are labeled at the beginning of the film. The “Mole” scenes on the beaches of France take place over the space of one week. The scenes at sea where the British civilian craft are deployed to rescue the troops encompasses one day. The planes flying overhead take one hour. If you understand this when you watch, you can see how these three points of view move forward to meet near the end of the film.

I liked Dunkirk. The writer/director Christopher Nolan did a good job showing what it may have been like for the three groups of men, and a few women who were nurses or were on board some of the ships that came for the rescue. The musical score with its percussive tones, composed by Hans Zimmer, accompanied the film’s action well. It is a different type of war movie, in a good way. I recommend that you see Dunkirk.

Journey to the Center of the Earth (2008)

My husband and I watched Journey to the Center of the Earth (2008) recently. It was such a fun movie! I enjoyed that this was a film virtually without violence, and especially that there was no violence perpetrated from human to human. It is rated PG for intense adventure action and some scary moments.

Trevor Anderson (Brendan Fraser) is in charge of his 13-year-old nephew Sean (Josh Hutcherson) for ten days while his sister-in-law Elizabeth (Jane Wheeler) prepares to move to Canada. Trevor is a scientist and volcanologist, and his brother Max (Jean Michel Paré), Sean’s father, disappeared when Sean was three years old, presumed dead.

His lab on the chopping block due to reduced funding, Trevor is none too happy about it. He is tracking seismic activity and when Sean notices that there are four locations around the world where the seismic sensors are still working, coupled with Trevor discovering the book Journey to the Center of the Earth by Jules Verne in a box of Max’s things that Elizabeth gave him, he decides to fly to Iceland to investigate. Sean insists on accompanying his uncle.

They are in search of a Professor Ásgeirsson who is also a volcanologist. Instead, they meet the professor’s daughter Hannah (Anita Briem) who is a mountain guide. She clues them in to the fact that Max was a Vernian, as was her father. A Vernian is someone who believes Jules Verne’s world as depicted in Journey to the Center of the Earth was fact and not fiction. An accident involving lightening and the collapse of a cave leads the trio eventually to a fissure in the cave where they fall seemingly endlessly into the center of the earth.

This film is a good one for tying up the loose ends when a family member, especially a brother and a father, is lost. Grief is an issue that is dealt with, and moving on, finding one’s strength and destiny is another. All three of the travelers must work together and come up with ideas to rescue them from certain death in the center of the earth. When the temperature gets too high, they will suffer from dehydration and never return to the surface. This is where the action adventure really gets intensely underway, and it is immensely entertaining. I especially enjoyed the ingenuity of each of the characters to find a solution and a way out when it appears next to impossible.

I enjoyed this world inside the earth. Such a fantasy with dangers around every corner, and some of it was depicted as truly beautiful. There’s humor too as the journey progresses, but also heart stopping action adventure. It’s a very pleasurable film to watch.

Jules Verne published the science fiction novel, Journey to the Center of the Earth, in 1864. It captured the public’s imagination quickly. There have been films made in 1959 and 1989 based loosely on the book. This version is not a sequel, but rather stands on its own.